ParamergeParamerge

Evidence · The claim ledger

Practitioner surveys & adoption7

Every cited claim this site makes in this evidence area, with the sources that ground it. Source keys link back to the full reference lists on the Evidence Registry.

EmpiricalIn a national survey of 1,179 U.S.-based social workers conducted from October 2025 to February 2026 by the University o…

In a national survey of 1,179 U.S.-based social workers conducted from October 2025 to February 2026 by the University of Texas at Austin in collaboration with NASW, 63.5% of respondents reported using AI tools or technologies in their current role.

Sources: borah2026a, isbanner2022

Appears on: /pan-lab, /practice/ai-literacy, /what-ai-can-do

EmpiricalIn the 2025–2026 University of Texas at Austin / NASW national survey of U.S. social workers, concerns about data privac…

In the 2025–2026 University of Texas at Austin / NASW national survey of U.S. social workers, concerns about data privacy and security were the most frequently reported challenge to using AI in practice (46.5% of respondents), and an increased focus on client privacy and confidentiality was the most requested improvement to AI tools for social work (50.4%).

Sources: borah2026a, isbanner2022

Appears on: /pan-lab, /practice/data-minimization

EmpiricalIn the 2025–2026 University of Texas at Austin / NASW national survey of U.S. social workers, 40.8% of respondents repor…

In the 2025–2026 University of Texas at Austin / NASW national survey of U.S. social workers, 40.8% of respondents reported ethical concerns about relying on AI for decision-making, and overreliance on automated decision-making was among the most frequently cited concerns overall.

Sources: borah2026a, pinazohernandis2026

Appears on: /pan-lab

EmpiricalThe 2025–2026 University of Texas at Austin / NASW national survey of U.S. social workers describes a gap between AI exp…

The 2025–2026 University of Texas at Austin / NASW national survey of U.S. social workers describes a gap between AI exposure and AI preparedness: 26.6% of respondents cited lack of training or understanding of AI technology as a challenge, 53.4% said training on AI tools and effective use would help, and clear guidelines on the ethical use of AI were the most-endorsed need (66.8%).

Sources: borah2026a, pinazohernandis2026

Appears on: /pan-lab, /practice/ai-literacy

EmpiricalIn the 2025–2026 University of Texas at Austin / NASW national survey of U.S. social workers, 42.1% of respondents repor…

In the 2025–2026 University of Texas at Austin / NASW national survey of U.S. social workers, 42.1% of respondents reported having no role in decision-making about AI adoption in their workplace; the report concludes most respondents have limited or no control over how AI technologies are selected or implemented within their organizations.

Sources: borah2026a

Appears on: /pan-lab

EmpiricalIn the open-ended comments of the 2025–2026 University of Texas at Austin / NASW national survey of U.S. social workers,…

In the open-ended comments of the 2025–2026 University of Texas at Austin / NASW national survey of U.S. social workers, ethical concerns — prominently including the environmental impact of AI infrastructure — were the most common theme, and the report's first recommendation includes environmental impact among the topics profession-wide ethical guidance should address.

Sources: borah2026a, massey2026

Appears on: /pan-lab

EmpiricalDocumentation and administrative tasks consume roughly half of practitioner time: a nationally representative US child-w…

Documentation and administrative tasks consume roughly half of practitioner time: a nationally representative US child-welfare workforce snapshot found caseworkers spend about 54% of the workday (4.3 of 8 hours) on paperwork and documentation, and a UK children's-services review reports staff spending over 50% of their time on case recording, paperwork, and related tasks.

Sources: opre2025, burbidge2022

Appears on: /pan-lab, /what-ai-can-do